No. SCCQ-11-0000747Supreme Court of Hawaii.
November 28, 2011.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
By: RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, DUFFY, and McKENNA, JJ.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the November 8, 2011 ruling on the certified question, it appears that the motion for reconsideration — filed on November 21, 2011 — was not filed within 10 days after the filing of the November 8, 2011 ruling. See HRAP 40(a) (“A motion for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10 days after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or ruling
Page 2
unless by special leave additional time is granted during such period by a judge or justice of the appellate court involved.”). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied as untimely.
793 P.2d 1189 (1990) Maher AZER, individually, as successor in interest to SGM Partners, and…
468 P.3d 126 (2020) STATE of Hawai`i, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael GLENN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. SCWC-16-0000604.Supreme Court of…
382 P.3d 195 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 383 KILAKILA 'O HALEAKALÂ , Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant, v. BOARD OF…
382 P.3d 176 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 364 KILAKILA 'O HALEAKALÂ , Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF…
382 P.3d 133 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 321 STATE OF HAWAI'I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LINCOLN PHILLIPS, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant…
382 P.3d 127 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 315 CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION, INC., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, v. NANCY CRAWFORD, as…