MENOR v. PHAM AND ASSOCIATES, 25429 (Haw. 2-5-2003)

25429Supreme Court of Hawaii.
February 5, 2003.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIV. NO. 1RC99-8426)

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, and ACOBA, JJ. and INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS ASSOCIATE JUDGE FOLEY, ASSIGNED BY REASON OF VACANCY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Upon review of the record, it appears that the August 15, 2002 summary judgment order and the September 25, 2002 order denying reconsideration in Civil No. 1RC99-8426, the Honorable Christopher P. McKenzie presiding, are not appealable final orders under HRS § 641-1(a) (1993). Although the orders disposed of Defendant/Cross-Claim Plaintiff/Appellee TIG Insurance’s (Appellee TIG Insurance) cross-claim against Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant/Appellant Finance Insurance, Ltd., no written order or stipulation for dismissal disposes of Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Ron Menor’s complaint against Appellee TIG Insurance. Therefore, the appealed orders are not final and we do not have jurisdiction. See, e.g., Casumpang v. ILWU, Local 142, 91 Haw. 425, 427, 984 P.2d 1251, 1253 (1999) (“[A]n order that fully disposes of an action in the district court may be final and appealable without the entry of judgment on a separate document, as long as the appealed order ends the litigation by fully deciding the rights and liabilities of all parties and leaves nothing further to be adjudicated.”); Ciesla v. Reddish, 78 Haw. 18, 20, 889 P.2d 702, 704 (1995) (citation omitted) (“Judgment is not final in a case until all claims of the parties have been terminated.”). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.