Categories: Hawaii Court Opinions

AGSALUD v. CLARKE, 66 Haw. 388 (1983)

662 P.2d 1120

JOSHUA C. AGSALUD, Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Appellant, v. ATHALIE R. CLARKE, dba OLU PUA GARDENS, Appellee

NO. 8909Supreme Court of Hawaii.
May 9, 1983

APPEAL FROM FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE KEI HIRANO, JUDGE.

LUM, C.J., NAKAMURA, PADGETT, HAYASHI, JJ., AND CIRCUIT JUDGE CHUN, ASSIGNED BY REASON OF VACANCY

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, State of Hawaii, from a determination by the Fifth Circuit Court which affirmed a decision by a referee for employment security appeals of the Department, the referee having reversed a determination by the unemployment insurance division of the Department that the appellee was not a farm under the statutory definition set forth in § 383-9, HRS. The effect of the decision below was to hold the appellee exempted from the provisions of the Hawaii Employment Security Law with respect to services performed by her employees. We reverse.

The enterprise run by appellee consists of 12-1/2 acres located at Kalaheo, Kauai, which is operated as an arboretum. An admission fee is charged to visitors of the gardens and the gate receipts account for 90% of the total revenues. The other 10% is derived 6% from rental income and 4% from the retail sale of plants.

Section 383-9, HRS, defines a farm as follows:

As used in this section, “farm” includes stock, dairy, poultry, fruit, furbearing animal, and truck farms, plantations,

Page 389

ranches, nurseries, ranges, greenhouses or other similar structures used primarily for the raising of agricultural or horticultural commodities and orchards.

We think it clear that appellee’s gardens, since they derive 90% of their income from fees charged to visitors to those gardens, are not used primarily for the purposes enumerated in the above definition.

Accordingly, the judgment below was erroneous as a matter of law and is reversed.

James W. Laseter, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief for appellant.

Donald H. Wilson (Case, Kay Lynch of counsel) on the brief for appellee.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

AZER v. MYERS, 793 P.2d 1189 (Haw. App. 1990)

793 P.2d 1189 (1990) Maher AZER, individually, as successor in interest to SGM Partners, and…

3 years ago

STATE v. GLENN, 468 P.3d 126 (2020)

468 P.3d 126 (2020) STATE of Hawai`i, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael GLENN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. SCWC-16-0000604.Supreme Court of…

4 years ago

HALEAKALĀ v. BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 382 P.3d 195 (Hawaii 2016)

382 P.3d 195 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 383 KILAKILA 'O HALEAKALÂ , Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant, v. BOARD OF…

9 years ago

HALEAKALĀ v. UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, 382 P.3d 176 (Hawaii 2016)

382 P.3d 176 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 364 KILAKILA 'O HALEAKALÂ , Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF…

9 years ago

STATE v. PHILLIPS, 382 P.3d 133 (Hawaii 2016)

382 P.3d 133 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 321 STATE OF HAWAI'I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LINCOLN PHILLIPS, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant…

9 years ago

CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. CRAWFORD, 382 P.3d 127 (Hawaii 2016)

382 P.3d 127 (Hawai'i 2016)138 Hawai'i 315 CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION, INC., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant, v. NANCY CRAWFORD, as…

9 years ago